In February, a Charlottesville jury found George Huguely, 24, guilty of second-degree murder and grand larceny in the May 2010 death of Yeardley Love.
Circuit Court Judge Edward Hogshire sentenced Huguely to 23 years for murder and to one year, concurrent with that sentence, for the larceny charge. He also sentenced Huguely to three years of supervised release.
The judge’s decision was slightly less than the recommendation of the jury, which had suggested the defendant be sentenced to 26 years in prison.
The case captured national attention and highlighted the volatile relationship of star athletes Huguely and Love, 22. Both played lacrosse for the university’s nationally ranked teams.
The jury did not agree with the prosecution that Huguely was guilty of first-degree murder, and it acquitted him on several other charges, including robbery, and breaking and entering to commit larceny.
Huguely has never denied he was in Love’s apartment nor that they had a fight.
At the center of the case were dueling portraits of Huguely, who prosecutors contend killed Love in a jealous rage. The defense argued the death was accidental.
Prosecutors claimed Huguely followed through with a threat to kill Love after accusing her of having a liaison with a lacrosse player from a competing university.
“I should have killed you,” he wrote in an e-mail to Love, which was read during the trial.
The defense argued that Huguely contributed to her death but had no intention of killing her.
During the trial, Huguely attorney Francis Lawrence described his client as “stupid, drunk — but not calculating.”
Police were initially called to Love’s Charlottesville apartment by a roommate who reported a possible alcohol overdose, authorities said at the time.
A medical examiner found Love died of blunt force trauma to the head.
The prosecution told jurors that Love’s death was slow and painful, claiming she could have remained alive for a couple of hours after Huguely left her apartment.
Inside an emotionally charged courtroom, Huguely hung his head and appeared to cry during the sentencing phase that followed the jury’s verdict.
“George’s decision and judgment were clouded by drinking, immaturity,” attorney Rhonda Quagliana told the jurors.
“It’s not an excuse. It’s not a justification. It’s just a fact … (at the time) George is a 22-year-old immersed in sex and alcohol.”